Editorial | News and Letters | Contact us | Bursaries | Bursary Reports | 30 Years Ago | History of KMS
![]() |
30
+ Years ago This page goes back to the medical society newsletter about 30 years ago. Even in such a short period of time the changes are eye watering. If you have any old photographs which may interest readers - please send them as email attachments |
||
|
These are extracts taken from one of the 1993 Editions of the Medical Society Newsletter
Sadly, all the very well known contributors have passed away but
their viewpoints are eye opening
Any comments would be appreciated via the contacts page and will
be included in the news and letters pages.
Recollections of Mill Street Hospital I came to Kdderminster in 1957 having been
appointed as orthopaedic and traumatic surgeon to the Mid Worcestershire
group of hospitals. At that time there was very little in the way of
facilities at Mill Street Hospital where I was employed for three
sessions and I remember arriving at the upper car park and looking at
the main theatre above it. This was a small room which doubled up for
operating theatre. Sisters office, changing room and sterilising
room. The whole building seemed forbidding. There were never more than
two or three cars parked in the car park. A 'blister' was next to the
theatre which became sister's office and changing room and it seemed to
me that there was much risk of this falling out onto the car park. The
laundry was downstairs next to the board room and the nurses used to run
downstairs for towels and gowns for our lists. The wards were pleasant though very over
crowded. Downstairs were the male wards -Samuel Stretton occupied by
general surgical and trauma patients. Towards the present X-ray
department down the corridor was the William Adam ward, this later
became a day room. Past the X-ray department the corridor carried on to
the children's ward, Stanley Baldwin named after the Prime
Minister. Upstairs there were three female wards, Faith, Hope and
Charity. The total bed compliment of the hospital was in the region of
75 -80 beds and this included of course medical patients as well,
although as far as I remember, most 'medical patients' were treated at
home. The two surgeons, Mr Gibbins and Mr.Doran,
covered Bromsgrove and Redditch like myself and it is difficult to
understand how this was done in those days as we could not possibly have
been in three different places at once. There was always a first class
resident surgical officer at both Bromsgrove General Hospital and
at Mill Street , and Mrs Ball who was one of them will undoubtedly
remember them all. Of course the work load was very light by today's
standards, all three towns were really not very much larger than a very
large village and the population growth all round has been quite
astounding Similarly, there was very little traffic on the roads at
first although we did have a number of motor cycle accdents, especially
late at night. Some horrific accidents kept us up at night fairly often
until the local young men gave up their motor cycles and took to four
wheels. There was only one portable X-ray machine
at Mill Street and no facilities existed for developing and printing
X-rays in the operating theatre. This made things difficult for hip
pinning. The fracture was reduced and Harold, the theatre
porter, skilfully held the limb in position while the X-rays were
taken. The radiographer had to be very fit as she had to dash down the
stairs, around four corners to the X-ray department and then back to the
theatre. Before I retired we were blessed with smooth anaesthesia, an
orthopaedic table to hold the reduced fracture and a large image
intensifier for these cases. It was surprising how well the patients did
at Mill Street ; perhaps they were made of tougher stuff although life
was certainly more peaceful in those days as a whole. John James
PRE-NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE
I came to Kidderminster in August 1946. Rumours
about Nye Bevan's intentions for a heath service were rife, and it
seemed important to get settled before one was posted to
darkest Lancashire . Ken Beatty had just bought a half share in the
Church Street Practice and offered me the other half. We had worked
together in the Army so knew each other's weaknesses. I borrowed £500
and bought the goodwill and equipment. This precluded any hopes of
raising a mortgage and I was lucky to be able to rent 25 Church Street .
next to the surgery for £60 per annum. We also rented the surgery at
number 24 The practice was mostly panel patients (working
men) and the club (their families). The Club paid 6d. a head per week
(£1/6/0d per annum) for free medicine. visits and consultations. This
brought in hard cash every week which was extremely welcome! We also had
a fair number of private patients. Some of these deserted immediately
they found out the practice had changed hands and their goodwill did not
usually extend to settling their unpaid bills. I still see one socially
who owes me £30. In 1946 this would have paid Tim's school fees at the
'Knoll' for a year. There were 14 doctors practising
in Kidderminster ; 8 were in Church Street , 4 were single handed and
the rest 2 - man practices. In spite of competition, all were on good
terms with each other socially and professionally, as we were with the
consultants and the hospital. We each did 13 surgeries a week. including
3 on Thursday (market day) and 2 on Saturday. In addition, we held a
sick parade every day (7.30 to 8.30 am) at the Pay Corps camp at
WoIverley and Polish camp at Drakelow, and at a displaced persons (Anglo
- lndian) camp up on Birchen Coppice. Astonishingly, I used to do
occasional post mortems for the coroners office as well ! The pattern of disease was different -
diphtheria, polio, whooping cough and TB were fairly frequent.
Coronaries were usually treated at home without the benefits of an
E.C.G. machine. The patients never complained and the thought of being
sued was inconceivable. Treatment was minimal, most patients ending up
with a bottle from the stock Winchesters in our dispensary. Early
diagnosis was the challenge! Midwifery was badly organised and largely
domicilliary. Most of the patients could not afford the £5 we charged
for total care, and ante-natal care was at the local authority
clinics run by the MOH. The result was a call to an obstetric emergency
to a patient one had never seen. Most midwives were adept at dripping on
the chloroform for POPs . In all, they were the bad old days for the
patients but exciting and interesting work for the doctors. Ken Beatty
and I changed things fairly rapidly in our practice, but the biggest and
best change came with the advent of the NHS. Sam Wadsworth
A PERSONAL VIEW OF THE FUTURE
Being within sight of retirement the invitation
to write about the future of hospital services in Kidderminster places
me in a dilemma. My natural reaction is to look back and say that the
best has passed. In the 1970s money was available and the hospital
service within the NHS was blossoming. Patients no longer inevitably
died from chronic renal failure, endoscopy became available as a
routine, cardiac investigation and surgery advanced dramatically and at
Kidderminster we became a proper District General Hospital . But I must look forward. On the wider front,
cancer, multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis are still to be
conquered not to mention HIV infection. Thus we have to harness medical
services (and that simply means money) to care for patients as best we
can and to exploit advances in prevention and treatment quickly and
efficiently. Government's aim to make money follow the patient is
basically sound but as there is no more money available, in real terms,
this means that resources have to be redistributed. Now this appears to
be all to the disadvantage of the hospital service Indeed, many things
must be cheaper done in General Practice and the community than in
hospital. Potential cripplers for the hospitals are
capital charges, loss of Crown Indemnity and the financial
responsibility for legal claims of all sorts. Reduction in junior
hospital doctors' hours has to be accommodated without compromising the
service or their training and experience and without further stressing
consultants who, contrary to popular belief, do not spend NHS time (or
much of their own time) on the golf course or with private patients Thus
NHS hospitals will be forced to reduce or amalgamate services that are
expensive in medical manpower for relatively small numbers of patients. We have already lost in-patient ENT services. We
have never had in-patient radiotherapy, invasive cardiology, renal
dialysis or neurosurgery. Will we be able to keep in-patient
ophthalmology and oral surgery for example? The development of our own
obstetric service is a tremendous bonus for local people but it is
against the trend. Perhaps the Nurse Practitioner grade will reduce the
need for on-call junior doctors in every speciality. The reduction in
junior medical staff involvement in out-patient clinics must be
accompanied by increased formal training and audit sessions that at the
moment are impossible. With more consultants, this may become realistic. I believe that there will be
a Kidderminster General Hospital for the foreseeable future. Geography
and the loyalty of our patients and General Practitioners are all on our
side. The quality and commitment of our new generation of consultants
are paramount The enthusiasm and interest of our newest junior doctors
is a constant reassurance to me for the future. Richard Taylor
FROM MILL STREET TO BEWDLEY ROAD When I was appointed
to Kidderminster General Hospital at Mill Street in 1949, it was in the
group of Mid-Worcestershire Hospitals which included redditch,
Bromsgrove and Tenbury. In 1951, Bromsgrove General Hospital was opened
and I was then working at Redditch, Bromsgrove and Kidderminster . For
the next decade the Group Management Committee directed most of its
energy and resources to developing that hospital with the result that
Kidderminster got very little attention or finance for its development. My only surgical colleagues at Mill Street were
John Stretton. General Surgeon and Ken Forsyth (1947 - 1975)
ophthalmologist. Walter Dunsby (1939 - 1980) was running an excellent
pathological service virtually single handed. Sadly, John Stretton died
suddenly in 1953. Soon afterwards. F.S. Doran joined me on the staff
from Bromsgrove and for the next five years Doran and I looked after the
general Surgery including emergencies at the four hospitals. At that
time. the RSOs at the two general hospitals were only partially trained
surgeons which put a considerable strain on us. This situation was relieved in 1958 when we
appointed Mr. Chitty as consultant surgeon to the group. Unfortunately.
he died after two years and after doing a locum for six months Douglas
Tooms was appointed in his place. During this lean time, the
orthopaedics was in charge of T. S. Donovan from Birmingham and N.
Scrase helped out with the trauma. In 1957, John James was appointed as
consultant in orthopaedics and trauma for the group. Pam Ball - our first
RSO with the FRCS - was appointed in 1958. and as you can imagine, the
tempo at Mill Street increased. She established an ITU in the boards
room and John Ball came on as House surgeon. Mr. Laljee followed soon
after as RSO in 1961 and stayed with us for two years, returning later
as SHO in the Casualty Department. During this time the medical staff
were Dr. Malins from Birmingham , Dr. Pat Thorne
who served the hospital well from 1954 to
1966 and Dr. Lurring, a GP Physician. In 1961 we started infiltrating
the wards at Blakebrook hospital, the old 'poor law' hospital. Two wards
were vacated on the old 'A' Block for surgical recovery patients
from Mill Street and were looked after by Dr. Pat Campion and later by
John Ball. In 1962 an extension was built on to the casualty theatre
at Mill street to enable us to use six trolleys for day patient minor
surgery. During the 1960s the Regional Hospital Board envisaged a large
general hospital at Prestwood. five miles from Kidderminster . This was
to cover the districts of Kidderminster, Stourbridge, Dudley and
Wordsley. The plan was dropped but by then the plans had already been
made to build on the Blakebrook site a subsidiary hospital to Prestwood. These plans were enlarged, we had numerous
meetings with the AHB and finally evolved a three phase building plan.
Dr. P. H. Beves who had been appointed consultant anaesthetist in 1966
was largely responsible for the design and equipment of the ITU. We also
worked together on the design and layout of the operating theatres. In
1967 a minor operating theatre was constructed in the kitchen block at
Blakebrook and we started doing intermediate and minor surgery there
using the wards on 'A' block. A year later a new I casualty department
had been built on its existing site. In 1969 the new twin theatres were
completed along with the nurses tower block, residents accommodation,
dining room, kitchens and administration office, so we were now ready to
move the surgical work over to Bewdley Road using the two wards on 'A'
block (now demolished) and the new theatres and X-ray, the latter under
the direction of Dr Macnamara In 1971 the new 'C' block for surgery was
opened and the patients transferred from old 'A' block. Their place was
taken by the medcaI patients and children from Mill Street . In 1972, 'S' block was found to be unsafe, it
could be shored up but ,after two years would have to be demolished. The
medical patients were temporarily accommodated in 'C' block but the
children were allowed to stay on the ground floor until a 'porta
cabin' type children's ward was established on a different site. This
apparent disaster was a blessing in disguise. By an astute move, our
then District manager Stuart Dickens, persuaded the RHB to build us a
new medical block in those two years. The present 'A' block was opened
in 1980. In the meantime, '0' block was under construction as part of a
Worcestershire project with Worcester District to provide in-patient and
day places for psychiatric patients attached to general Hospitals. Dr
Robertson was appointed Consultant in psychiatry. The pathology and
physiotherapy departments were split between Mill Street and Bewdley
Road . With the opening of 'C' block and the new Post
Graduate Medical centre, the hospital began to take off. Dr. Peaston
had been appointed consultant physician in 1969 and Drs. Taylor and
Murray came in 1972. Walford Gillison was appointed Consultant Surgeon
in 1973 and when Dr. Peaston left in 1975 Dr. Stephen Booth was
appointed in his place. Dr. Eales returned to Kidderminster as
pathologist after some absence at Dudley Road Hospital to join Martin
Lewis, the haematologist. Since I retired in
1979 many changes have taken place with new consultants and a large
increase in junior doctors. The new 'E' block (phase V) is catering for
paediatrics, geriatrics and maternity and the newest block (phase VI)
will provide the surgical beds, theatre and ITU along with maternity,
geriatrics and a complete new outpatient department. Mill Street will
then be closed. This will complete the development of one of the best
District General Hospitals in the Region. R.E. (Bob) Gibbins
THE FUTURE OF
PERSONAL CARE IN THE WYRE FOREST Although the NHS rarely seems to run on an even
keel it has, fairly consistently sustained and improved health care in
this locality. The relationship seems likely to continue, so to look
forward to our future locally we must first read the National Health tea
leaves! I believe the future direction of challenge is clear. The rate
of change is less so, being driven politically and economically by a
heady mixture of aspiration and expedience. For the future, affordability will be 'the
ticket', finance being the main determinant. Given the economic status
of the country and taking into account future probabilities it seems
fair to conclude that the major rationale on the future health service
will be financial realism. What we see now is an overpowering need to
remodel the health care system so that it will in the long term be
consistent with our likely resources, economically used. This will
require a series of mutations by which the National Health Service will
be translated from a total health care provision into a much more
selective system mainly based on providing core services. Its value and
effectiveness will be monitored by a body such as the Audit Commission. With considerable difficulty but for!
overwhelming economic reasons the I government will have to jettison
various parts of the political baggage of the NHS - like a comprehensive
service, free at the point of use. What will emerge will be a range of
services confined to a national menu of approved clinical options and
therapies. This will, in effect be a 'health formulary'. It will consist
of practices, procedures and potions which are both affordable and of
proven efficacy. Within the next decade, the evaluation of all
therapeutic processes will have become a major speciality in its own
right, driven by the health purchasers, nationally and commercially. Because of established trends in recruitment and
retirement the majority of doctors will be women in 20 years time, most
of them being the generalist service. In terms of total manpower the
National Health Service will no longer be the largest employer
in Europe (currently 1.25 million employees) but will become a very
small and concentrated framework. It will identity key health policies
and titrate the range of health service provision in the light of them.
Secondly, it will be directing and managing subsidiary modules of
relatively independent health care businesses. The latter will include
substantial elements of fairly autonomous professionals whose overall
pace and direction will be determined by the national financial
allocations. At the point of consumption of health care there
will have been equally significant changes. Patients expectations will
have continued to rise and the variety of health options will have
continued to expand dramatically - the continuing achievement of one
medical miracle a month will for example leave no stone unturned ! The
combination of rising expectations and ever expanding options will mean
that the range of services that are possible will widen and weaken
remorselessly. As medical science continues to press forward on the
theoretical frontiers of medicine in pursuit of the ultimate there will,
in the NHS, inevitably have to be a much more rational use of personal
skills and abilities by everyone. So that all health care workers and
indeed patients will need to contribute selectively at the upper level
of their personal ability but to no lower clinical standard. Not only
will super specialisation progress dramatically but the organisation of
care, recognising the benefits of concentrating skill and experience,
will progressively limit the range of activity of individual clinicians
and establishments in the pursuit of effectiveness, safety and as a
defence against litigation. Many distinctions will become blurred. Primary
and secondary care will be difficult to distinguish as isolated clinical
activities inevitably become a matter of the past. Virtually all care
will be aggregated on to single sites providing a co-ordinated delivery
on a 'one-stop-shop' basis. The Wyre Forest will have one medical
'Carrefour' for the sake of convenience, efficiency and integrated
activity. This will be closely linked with neighbouring hospitals and
provider units and each of these can be expected to concentrate on
complimentary areas of clinical activity to a much greater degree than
at present. The planning and provision of specialist clinical care will
be largely based on levels of turnover and clinical experience, the
attainment of clinical standards being ranked above issues such as
availability and access. What will also be impressive will be the
relative absence of in-patient facilities, with the establishment of
linked but independent 'hotel-care' accommodation for those patients
where some continuity is necessary. The supermarket analogy will however not stop
there. The major provider conglomerates, in terms of their style and
modus operandi, will lean more and more on the commercial philosophies
rather than follow the old patterns of Whitehall . With the, result that
for example a wide range of non NHS services will be promoted on the
back of basic NHS provisions (just as happens in the , practice of eye
care today). For example, a visit from the local hospital's
gynaecological marketing director will be no more surprising tomorrow,
than' a call from today's pharmaceutical representative. Organisationally the key health care framework
will be a lean one supporting a series of integrated modules responsible
for providing a selected range of services. Within the modules the
specialist professionals and their staff will largely be self employed
in direct contract with the provider units for the basic NHS services
and they will provide. within the same framework. private services
beyond the range of NHS core items. 'Ah,' you say 'what about the
patients?' Well, hopefully the General Practitioner will continue and
provide an independent personal care service and the crucial patient
advocacy - but then we mustn't be too optimistic must we?
John Ball
|
||
|
Editorial | News and Letters |
Contact us |
Bursaries | Bursary Reports
| 30 Years Ago
| History of KMS |
||